"Justice is the great work of human beings on Earth. Without justice, there's no freedom, there's no liberty, there's no fulfillment of human possibilities."
That's a pretty strong, sentimental ad in defense of the word "sucks," right?
"The word sucks is now a protest word."
And those big-name brands with big-time trademarks only have until June 1 to act before the widespread public can buy domain names and make them live. Part of the trouble is trademark holders don't exactly want their brands associated with a domain so negative and easily accessible.
For example, instead of going to Apple.com, you could almost just as easily go to Apple.sucks — a site that'd more than likely be critical of the tech giant.
We use Apple as an example because it actually tops the list of the company trademarks people are seeking. Google.sucks, Microsoft.sucks, Facebook.sucks and Comcast.sucks round out the top five.
Apple, among other big companies, have put up the cash to buy their domain and protect it from falling into the wrong hands, but that's not the only pain.
"It does feel a little slimy, like an extortion scheme," CNET senior editor Jeff Bakalar told CBS.
"I basically think it's extortion."
That last commenter was J. Scott Evans, associate general counsel at Adobe Systems. He says one of the biggest issues with the .sucks domain name is the price — $2,500.
That's a much, much steeper price than most non-dot-com names that generally go in the $100-a-year range.
But the only reason we're having this debate in the first place is because the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the nonprofit organization overseeing the Internet's naming system, already approved it — approved it because no one disapproved of it while it was under consideration.
No objections until now, it appears.