Yates Warned White House That Flynn Could Be Blackmailed By Russians

Yates Warned White House That Flynn Could Be Blackmailed By Russians
The former acting attorney general said she first warned White House counsel just six days after President Trump's inauguration.

Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates warned the White House counsel that former national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn could be blackmailed.

"The Russians also knew about what Gen. Flynn had done, and the Russians also knew that Gen. Flynn had misled the vice president and others," Yates said. "They likely had proof of this information, and that created a compromise situation."

Yates, who testified before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee Monday, said she spoke on three different occasions with White House counsel Don McGahn. They first spoke on Jan. 26.

"The first thing we did was to explain to Mr. McGahn that the underlying conduct that Gen. Flynn has engaged in was problematic in and of itself," Yates said.

Yates' testimony came hours after several networks reported President Obama himself warned then-President-elect Donald Trump against hiring Flynn during their meeting Nov. 10.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer acknowledged that Obama "made it known" that he wasn't "a fan" of Flynn's but put the burden back on the Obama administration.

"If President Obama was truly concerned about Gen. Flynn, why didn't he suspend Gen. Flynn's security clearance, which they had just reapproved months earlier?" Spicer said to reporters. 

During the hearing, senators also pressed Yates on her decision not to defend President Trump's first executive order, banning immigration from seven majority-Muslim countries. Trump subsequently fired Yates.

"I voted for your confirmation because I believed that you had a distinguished career. But I have to tell you that I find it enormously disappointing that you somehow vetoed the decision of the Office of Legal Counsel with regard to the lawfulness of the president's order and decided instead that you would countermand the executive order of the president of the United States because you happened to disagree with it as a policy matter," Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said.

Yates replied: "Let me make one thing clear: It was not purely as a policy matter. In fact, I remember my confirmation hearing: In an exchange that I had with you and other of your colleagues where you specifically asked me in that hearing that if the president asked me to do something that was unlawful or unconstitutional, and one of your colleagues said or even just that would reflect poorly on the Department of Justice, would I say no? And I looked at this. I made a determination that I believed that it was unlawful. I also thought that it was inconsistent with the principles of the Department of Justice, and I said no. And that's what I promised you I would do, and that's what I did."