Supreme Court Debates Census Citizenship Question
The Supreme Court will decide whether the Department of Commerce can add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
The Supreme Court heard a tense round of arguments Tuesday as the high court prepares to decide whether the Trump administration can add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The state of New York is leading the charge. Their lawyer told the nine-member panel that re-adding the question, which was removed nearly 70 years ago, would skew the accuracy of the data. Supreme Court expert Amy Howe says the liberal justices and those who brought the case believe some won't fill out the questionnaire at all out of fear.
"If you have the citizenship question on the census, you're going to have households with undocumented immigrants much less likely to respond," she explained.
That, they say, could hurt the report's accuracy. The Census Bureau agreed. It issued numerous reports saying not only would adding the question cost more, but it expects 5.8% of the population won't respond. It says that's a conservative estimate.
It's all about representation and money. The data is used to allocate the 435 members of the House of Representatives. If less people respond, those areas may receive less representation.
"States that have large populations of Hispanics and undocumented immigrants tend to skew Democratic. This could result in fewer democratic seats in the house of representatives," said Howe.
It also determines the electoral votes, so blue states could be in trouble there as well. Howe says $900 billion of funding used census data for 320 federal programs in fiscal year 2016. These communities could stand to lose a lot of money that typically helps them.
The federal government, on the other hand, says it's bringing back the citizenship question to help the Department of Justice better enforce the Voting Rights Act. It also says it exists in other census questionnaires sent to fewer households across the country. Critics like the protesters outside the Court say Secretary Wilbur Ross is just looking for a reason to add the question.
The justices, who typically joke around throughout arguments, were interrupting each other more than usual. Howe thinks this is an indication of a divided court.
"It seems like we're looking at one of the classical 5-4 decisions with conservative justices on one side and the liberal justices on the other side," said Howe.
A decision won't be handed down until June, the same month the census is scheduled to be finalized for printing.
Gay Rights And Religion Clash At The Supreme Court
A Colorado web designer is at the center of a controversial case for refusing to design websites for gay couples because of her Christian beliefs.By Andrew Harnik / AP
Supreme Court Hearing Cases On Same-Sex Couples, State Lawmaker Rights
Two significant cases will be heard at the Supreme Court this week that could have major implications nationally.By David Zalubowski / AP
Roberts Delays Handover Of Trump Tax Returns To House Panel
Roberts' order gives the Supreme Court time to weigh the legal issues in Trump's emergency appeal to the high court, filed Monday.By José Luis Villegas / AP
Affidavit: Club Q Shooter Opened Fire Upon Entering The Building
The shooter who killed five and injured more than a dozen others was charged with 305 crimes, including hate crimes.By David Zalubowski / AP
Doctors: Get Your Flu, COVID Vaccines Now To Be Safe During Holidays
There's more room for the flu and COVID to spread as restrictions subside, but not as many people are up to date on their vaccines either.By Ted S. Warren / AP
Are Donations From Billionaire Philanthropists What They Say They Are?
While many agree those dealing in philanthropy have great intentions, skeptics argue whether charity from the wealthy is actually honest.By Elaine Thompson / AP