In a perfect world, science informs policy — especially where that policy relates to science.
But new research shows the reverse might be true, at least when it comes to climate change. (Video via GoPro)
In the political world, an elected official can present a snowball in the Senate as evidence climate change isn't happening. (Video via C-SPAN)
In their paper, published in the journal Global Environmental Change, the researchers argue vested interests and political figures have scammed scientists into using the language of deniers and causing an appearance of uncertainty.
Literally, scammed: SCAM stands for Scientific Certainty Argumentation Method, a strategy of creating uncertainty to push inaction.
"The Colbert Report" compiled a montage of politicians saying: "I'm not qualified to debate the science over climate change. I'm not a scientist. I'm not a scientist. I'm not a scientist."
As that "Colbert Report" bit highlighted, several politicians have deflected questions about climate change as well, excusing themselves as "not scientists," which furthers public uncertainty. (Video via PBS)
It's worked in the past: Tobacco companies used perceived uncertainty in the medical community to push cigarettes after links to cancer and other diseases emerged. (Video via Camel)
The researchers argue these SCAM arguments have played on scientists' own skepticism, causing them to double back on their own conclusions and generally causing more uncertainty. (Video via National Science Foundation)
As an example of concepts from climate contrarians infiltrating the scientific community, the paper points to two issues of Nature and a host of other papers focusing on the perceived "pause" in warming. (Video via Yale University, NASA)
In the end, they argue, more work needs to be done in strengthening the boundary between science and pseudoscience, and they encourage scientists not to be swayed or distracted by unfounded claims. (Video via C-SPAN)
This video includes an image from NASA/Goddard/Bill Hrybyk.