Talk Show Host Tries Out "Torture"

12345
RSS Feeds
May 27, 2009
2:26
Erich “Mancow” Muller was voluntarily waterboarded recently to get firsthand experience of the interrogation technique. Newsy.com looks at what he learned, and whether it matters.
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No PhotoJ Smith
June 26, 2009
06:02 PM
Ridiculous, how about testing your head being chopped of, thats what the people that were waterboarded choose to do.
No PhotoFreshprince
May 29, 2009
01:25 PM
I appreciate the Guardian's point about the journalists' experience being qualitatively different than that of those being waterboarded for real.
CHARLESCHARLES
May 28, 2009
11:06 PM
Heres another perspective......look this guy goes 7 minutes and he's fine,.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0SnqfFXc1k
No PhotoJoanne Sumner
May 28, 2009
10:43 PM
ok charlie!! i'll waterboard you, we'll see how long you last. sounds like fun
melvin polatnickmelvin polatnick
May 28, 2009
08:35 PM
Nothing is as horrible to experience as the feeling of drowning. It leads to panic. Confessions would come as quickly as the water that is going down a throat. Those that deny that it is torture are the sadists that use it on their victims.
No PhotoBrian
May 28, 2009
07:12 PM
Sean Hannity is the one I was holding out for, but naturally he wussed out. Ever notice that we only waterboard Muslims? If it's not torture, why not allow police to start waterboarding too?
econcurious88econcurious88
May 28, 2009
03:18 PM
Well, of course that can make it stop when they choose. But I don't think these actions are useless--they prove how unbearable and horrific these tortures are. As the Vanity Fair clip pointed out, the person is literally being drowned slowly. And that person cannot say "stop". If anything, there should be no more debate over whether or not waterboarding constitutes torture.
apple2kapple2k
May 28, 2009
02:36 PM
Did anyone else see Bill O'Rielly agree to be waterboarded on national television and then just pretend like it never happened? I'd like to see how long he could go. It is torture no doubt about it, that shouldn't be the debate. The debate should be whether we should have done it or not.
CHARLESCHARLES
May 28, 2009
01:08 PM
I used to do this to my little brother. He could go much longer than 5 seconds. Kiddding... But they don't usually use water anyways, mainly gasoline.
Jessi StaffordJessi Stafford
May 28, 2009
01:01 PM
I think it's powerful that even after a 30 second stunt these media guys are claiming it felt like torture. I think it definitely proves that prolonged exposure to waterboarding is not something to dismiss.
TonyTony
May 28, 2009
12:33 PM
Maybe that IS the point! If people who are able to get out of it by simply sitting up do so after just 5 seconds, imagine the prisoners who aren't able to stop the procedure. Sure, it may seem like a stunt but it's really a powerful statement about the power of this torture technique.
CHARLESCHARLES
May 28, 2009
11:59 AM
What a stupid media stunt!! He was "waterboarded" for 5 seconds, what a fraud. What is that supposed to show me? I could do at least 30 seconds, maybe a full minute. The prisoners have to endure hours of that, thats when its torture. What those guys did is nothing close to torture, just one short stunt.
No Photokarylew
May 28, 2009
11:31 AM
I agree with The Guardian. These are a ridiculous stunts. I think we can all imagine that someone tying you down and pouring water on your face is a horrible experience. No need for you to show me what it was like for your "fake" experience.
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy