Statecraft vs. Stagecraft

12345
RSS Feeds
June 24, 2009
1:55
With a pre-arranged question during a press conference, the White House set off a chain of media reactions. Newsy.com takes a look.
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No PhotoDebbie Karper
June 26, 2009
02:59 PM
I feel that everything he says is wrote down and nothing is from his heart or known to him. He is like a puppet. This press conference only confirms that. I just wonder when the strings will break and we will see him as he really is with all the knowledge he really DOES not have, and for it to be exposed to all people all over the World. He is a disgrace to America.
No Photofrodo
June 26, 2009
02:40 PM
I think newsy missed the boat a bit here. The White House approached Nico about attending the press conference because Obama was following his coverage of dispatches from Iranians - that's why he was given the temporary press pass so he could ask a question from an Iranian. Obama blew the situation by acknowledging that he was planning to call on Nico, but why else would he be there if the question wasn't pre-arranged? New media outlets only have a couple seats in the White House press corps, so it's not like he would have been called on at all, without sanctioned access.
robotsoulrobotsoul
June 26, 2009
10:57 AM
Happens all the time. This isn't anything novel, it is actually pretty common practice and has been for a long time. The relationship between the WH press corp core and whatever administration is in office is a political one ( just like everything in D.C.). Who asks questions, gets scoops from " high ranking WH officials" and the like are determined by a silent system of quid pro quo. I think that the fact that it was disclosed that this was an arranged question should negate any concerns about the fact that it was used.
No PhotoBob Lozano
June 26, 2009
02:00 AM
Of course it's lame to have pre-arranged questions in a "news conference", but how is that really an different than the love affair most of the new and old media have had with Obama for a couple of years now?

Add to that the ABC infomercial from the White House this week (I wouldn't have been surprised to hear of QVC-style White House souvenirs for sale!), and only a fool would expect serious questions from most media outlets (old or new) of Obama.
No PhotoTheFox
June 25, 2009
03:29 PM
I agree with the previous sentiments expressed here. I have no problem with the question itself, but the way that it was handled is less than exemplary. Hopefully it won't happen again.
No PhotoDavid Coughlin
June 25, 2009
09:31 AM
Preselected questions transform press conferences into political infomercials.
More and more people are being told to ignore the empty suit Wizard of Oz behind the curtain?
Obama is proving that he is only one sound bite deep on most issues.
No Photoeileen simpson
June 24, 2009
08:58 PM
dear president Obama, i know this isn't your fault but i watched my baby die that i fought so hard to keep alive because i had no health insurance beacause we couldn't afford it. i know you can't bring my son back but i hope you can help another mother in the future so they won't have to feel the pain that myself, my family and son had to go through. His name my son, was Juwels Alexander Simpson born 6/4/09 - died 6/4/09 survived for three hours on his own before he died in my arms because we had no insurance. i doubt you'll answer this comment. but i hope you at least read it. there are other mother out there like me. also one more thing whaat gives the hospitals the right to choose if your child should live or die because the parents don't have any. they are not God.
No PhotoMattS
June 24, 2009
07:04 PM
The question itself was justified, but the arrangements leading up to the question casts a lot a doubt about the White House press office. Not only did Obama give preferential treatment to this reporter in ensuring that the reporter got to ask his questions, the staged nature of the question takes objectivity out of journalism. The Huffington Post appears to be in Obama's hip pocket.
No Photocbs5x4
June 24, 2009
04:51 PM
The staged question made Obama, Huffington Post and the US look bad. If stage questions become a common occurrence, how will the general public know the difference? Also, it makes it look like journalism reporters and the government are working hand-in-hand. Eventually it leads to the question, how, then, could journalists be considered gatekeepers if they are working for the people they are working to investigate?
zeq2m8zeq2m8
June 24, 2009
04:12 PM
Although it was a good question in the end to which Obama lacked a complete answer, I'm not on board with the whole pre-arranged thing. The whole thing felt canned and cheap. "New media" outlets like the Huffington Post should be given a fair chance to ask their (or others') questions, but not like this.
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy