Softening U.S Foreign Policy on Israel

12345
RSS Feeds
November 2, 2009
2:39
Media sources question whether or not the U.S. is impartial in the Middle East peace talks after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called Israel's settlement offer as ‘unprecedented.’
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
robotsoulrobotsoul
November 3, 2009
04:22 PM
I think this signifies a failure on Clinton's part. Throughout the campaign you couldn't swing a dead horse without hearing her carp about how we need "preconditions" before entering into negotiations with non-compliant countries. In this case, she fell short of getting Israel to agree to a pretty important ( to the Palestinians/region/world community) precondition. Without full cooperation on this one very important issue peace talks will inevitably be impotent. She is posturing. "Not backing down to Palestinian pressure" is code for the other guy (Israel) won't back down to me so I gotta look tough on someone. This is absolutely backpedaling, like every other Secty. of State before her she is letting Israel get away with simply ignoring U.S. mandates and rewarding them with all that "free propaganda" she hated so much during the campaign. All I gotta say is #epicClintonFail.
econcurious88econcurious88
November 3, 2009
01:27 PM
I actually somewhat agree with John Hannity in that last clip. We should TRY to be as objective as we can as a nation--showing preference to one side is only going to hurt us at this point. Now, obviously under the Bush admin, there was a huge preference given towards Israel over Palestine. So, I do think the U.S. needs to show sensitivity in its dealings and perhaps try to repair any damages caused by the Palestine exclusions. Still, ideally, this country does not want to alienate either one but rather work with both of them. Sadly, that is the most difficult step.
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy