Same Old, Same Old

12345
RSS Feeds
June 16, 2009
2:18
The Iran presidential election has media questioning Obama’s next move and the state of future U.S. relations with Iran. Newsy.com tracks perspectives.
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No PhotoMohammad T. Moslehi
June 20, 2009
06:40 PM
If the US and the west is really serious in getting rid of Nuclear and Terrorist issues in the world the time is now to throw their full fledged support behind the Iranian people who have been on the streets of Iran for the past 8 days and nights. Help tjhe Iranian people to overthrow this nasty criminal regime in Iran who have been systematically violating even the very basic rights of the Iranians for the past 30 years.
By taking no sides it means that you are supporting the nasty criminal regime in Iran, thus betraying the Iranian people who are your friends. I recommend that you register yourselves in the minds and hearts of the Iranians once and for all in the history and clean up your past mistakes and mis-deeds. If you are really serious do it and the world will live in peace forever. Learn from your mistakes please and the time is now to throw your support behind the aspirations of the Iranian people. The regime is in deep troubel and it has been shaken. If it surives this time. You will see that the wave of executions by hundereds of thousand will start. You were decived by Khatami 12 years ago, let that not happen again.
No Photosoudabeh Ghaemi
June 16, 2009
05:18 PM
President Obama & CIA,

Please destroy the Molla's regim. Please help Iranian People. Please use the military action & totally get rerd of the Molla's regim. Iranian are voting to Mossavi at this moment, because they have no other choice. Please help Iranian & use U.S force to get red of All the Molla's regim.

Regards,

Soudabeh Ghaemi
No PhotoTheFox
June 16, 2009
01:24 PM
Iran is a far cry from 'true democracy,' as the current election shows. However, I agree that any reform needs to start with Iran, we can't force them and we definitely can't go to war. And the riots and general unrest is a good sign: it shows that people are fed up with the oppressive regime.

As for Obama, he certainly is in a sticky situation with the apparent re-election of Ahmadinejad, and while it would be nice to hear something condemnatory about the rather obvious election fraud it is in his best interest to remain silent until this shakes out.
No Photocshort
June 16, 2009
12:53 PM
First of all, it is a little selfish and self-centered for the US to be primarily concerned about Iran and Obama's relationship. People are being beaten, arrested, and killed in Iran in their fight for Democracy. War with Iran is currently not an option for the US. The Bush administration doubled the US debt and in a later portion of Meet with Press, Obama is predicted to double our debt AGAIN making us 10 trillion dollars in debt. (An estimation that was concluded from the Obama's administration's numbers) Truth is we don't have the money for a war. True Democracy needs to come from within Iran not from an outside force.
robotsoulrobotsoul
June 16, 2009
12:16 PM
can you officially call it a re-election? hypothetically, his re-election would energize hawks on the right (notice the Fox news coverage is strangely pro-Obama) who advocate war with Iran. It would force the Pres. into an awkward position, he has said he would engage in talks with Iran without preconditions so he would have to meet with him and thereby tacitly show his support for a corrupt regime. Also, he would have to do this while the press showed running footage of student protesters being beaten by Iranian police (actually I am not sure if they have that footage b/c is hasn't been on TV). Overall, the re-election of Ahmadinejad would be an absolute disaster for the president given the protests.
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy