A multisource video news service that highlights nuances in reporting from media outlets around the world.

(thumbnail image: Bild)

Two passengers are dead and 14 wounded after waves estimated at three stories tall struck the Louis Majesty, a cruise ship heading through the Mediterranean.

Some scientists and media outlets are blaming a phenomenon known as the "rogue wave," but others say it isn't even part of the story.

We're looking at perspectives and coverage from Fox News, Wired.com, CNN, and MSNBC.

A Fox News anchor was among those blaming "rogue waves," for the incident, and talked with an oceanographer to explain just how the accident happened:

"We call them rogue waves, these are massive waves in the ocean that suddenly pop up out of almost nowhere. Typically they're associated with a weather event and often where an ocean current and a big weather event occurs."

But a scientist on Wired.com says it isn't so easy to explain how, where, or why a rogue wave forms.

"We don't know what's going on out there.  There are some theories, but I don't think those theories can ever translate into the real ocean environment."

Other news outlets took a direct approach to dismissing the "rogue wave" discussion.  A CNN meteorologist explains how these waves weren't quite up to par.

"The waves which hit the ship were reported to be between 8-9 meters. This would not be considered a 'rogue' wave, as rogue waves must have a height at least double the significant wave height, but it is nevertheless abnormally high."

A correspondent on MSNBC says other meteorologists are blaming severe weather for the massive--but not rogue--waves.

"It was in the Mediterranean, it ran into a nasty weather system just off the coast of France and Spain that had whipped up 60-mile-an-hour sustained winds.  Meteorologists say that the sustained winds are really the key to what happened here, that they were strong enough and sustained long enough to create a succession of these monster waves."