"Not Above the Law"

12345
RSS Feeds
April 22, 2009
2:45
As U.S. President Barack Obama announces Bush administration officials could face prosecution for harsh interrogation tactics, many wonder whether this signals a policy change.
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No PhotoPatti
June 24, 2009
10:52 PM
Obama said "We(government)pay for medicaid and medicare."
I'am on disability, $96.00 of my check goes to medicare. What the hell does he think he's talking about? Yes, I voted for Obama.
No Photojohngermaine
June 24, 2009
03:32 AM
It is nice to know America is on the way to becoming a second class country. What if Whites were killing blacks in South Africa now. Would Obama have acted and said the same things. He cares nothing about the people he only wants to negotiate with a dictator. GO CHINA GO CHINA dumb american liberals.
No Photow.homer carlisle
June 11, 2009
04:45 PM
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHEN THE SUPREME OR JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL ABOUT OBAMA CORRECT BIRTH---SEEMS BOTH PARTERS ARE DROPPING THE BALL--WHERE IS OUR FAITH WHEN BOTH PARTIES ARE LETTING US DOWN--IS OUR DEMOCRACY WORTH FIGHTING FOR---WILL WE LET SOCIALISM SLOWLY TAKE OVER---I WOULD LIKE TO BELIEVE IN FREEDOM---WHY THE HIGHEST OFFICE STILL IN DOUBT---STAND UP-DEMOCRATS ALSO REPUBLICANS-SEEMS IT ONLY CONCERNS ALL THE SMALL VOTERS---CAN YOU WITHOUT DOUBT SAY HE IS A TRUE BORN AMERICAN---IS OUR CONSTITUTION WORTH ANYTHING ???
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoGlenn
June 7, 2009
05:47 PM
Facts of Law are facts of Law. If there was a clear violation in the torture case then these people will have to be prosecuted.
Chaney's excuse of " But it was a secussful means by which we got information, therefor the means justify the ends. Then torture is only illeagle if you get caught!! I don't think so.
It is either legal or illegal. No middle ground in morals court.
No PhotoTerrance L Singleton
May 3, 2009
02:55 AM
If it is proven that the bush administration knowingly broke laws, they should be punished. Period!And while they are being punished, we can continue with the daunting task of rebuilding our economy. This would also present a clear message to other countries that America is changing. Keep in mind Saddam was executed for murdering and torturing Muslims. Why should the Bush administration not be held to the standard they demanded of Saddam? Saddam tortuing and murdering his own people was the bases of the war in iraq in the first place, Well we all know it was about the oil. The bush family oil. They have got to be making millions with the oil they own in Iraq. The sad part is the U.S. now goes into a recession because of the cost of the war in IRAQ. Basically our soldiers are baby sitting the bush family oil and investments in Iraq. They got richer, the U.S. falls into recession, Bush is out of office. And the bush family lives happily ever after. Damn right they should be prosecuted. Duh! Clinton was almost impeached for getting oral sex. Our country goes to war over a 911 that could have been prevented, CIA intelligence informed bush of the threats weeks before 911,war over weapons of mass destruction that never were existed. This war was so silly because everyone outside of this country has a better understanding of whats really going on in this country than typical citizens because we wait for the news to tell us what to think.
No Photonancy smith
April 29, 2009
09:20 AM
MR.OBAMA WHY IS IT THAT A FAMILY OF 6 CANTS GET FOOD STAMPS CAUSE IT GOES WHAT YOU MAKE NOT WHAT A PERSON BRINGS HOME. I AM SICK CANT GO TO DR. BUT CANT AFFORD INNSURANCE HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF MY CHILDREN FIRST
No PhotoGalen Richards
April 28, 2009
10:25 AM
I am a Republican/Libertarian and I do believe that both Bush and Cheney should be tried for war crimes and I think 911 needs a new independent international investigation. Bush and his administration had a lot to gain from 911. I don't see how much Muslims had to gain from 911. The question is always to follow the money trail. Who benefited the most from 911 and who benefited from all the new weapons sold and created.
jiffypopjiffypop
April 22, 2009
05:29 PM
It seems to me that the pressure being put on Obama is causing him to say that 'the door is now left open for prosecution' but I am guessing it will never happen. There are a few strong advocates for this but in the end, who would it service? As Obama said in his speech earlier, there are many other things happening in our country presently that deserve our attention. To dwell in the past would be ineffective and a waste of time.
myfairladymyfairlady
April 22, 2009
05:25 PM
This is a very sticky issue...all he wants to do is move forward, but i agree, if he doesn't prosecute then he is turning away from serious unlawful behavior
DaBearsssDaBearsss
April 22, 2009
04:15 PM
focus on the future. I think if Obama was speaking his mind he wouldn't want to prosecute these guys, but you also don't want it to look like your just going to turn a blind eye to a serious crime
econcurious88econcurious88
April 22, 2009
04:12 PM
There is certainly a large amount of pressure upon President Obama, his administration and anyone involved in this country's judicial system--particularly since the release of the torture memos. I understand that the President probably feels as if there are no other alternatives right now. But honestly, if it is at all possible, I think it would hue of the U.S. to point out these crimes, understand they were absolutely unacceptable and then proceed with the endless amount of challenges we have in front of us right now.
No Photolam5y3
April 22, 2009
03:12 PM
I'm not really sure what punishing the Bush Administration now would really do. Sure, they probably shouldn't have done some of the things that they did, but at the same time, do we really have the time to continue fighting with the past. We are dealing with some tough economic times right now, and should probably focus more of our economy and stabilizing that, rather than focus on things that happened in the past, that are not affecting the present. Maybe I'm wrong, but I will clarify that I am a firm believer in "The past is the past, the future is coming, and we will live it when it comes, and the present is what we should focus on."
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy