NASA Smashes Space Probe into Moon

12345
RSS Feeds
October 12, 2009
2:24
NASA's latest mission "LCROSS" involves smashing a space probe into the lunar surface, in hopes of finding water, hydrogen and other minerals. Media outlets have mixed reactions.
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No Photostaylorfox
November 5, 2009
01:12 PM
Amazing how different the news stories were.
No Photosteven
October 19, 2009
05:04 AM
Wow
No Photomlyness
October 18, 2009
07:59 PM
I think that kaybosasuke needs to stop being so negative, negative Nancy!
No Photokaybosasuke
October 18, 2009
12:10 AM
Are you serious Akorozko?! If we humans still rely on only the earth when it or the sun decide to give out, there goes our entire race and possibly the only intellegent species in all existence. We cant waste time thinking the planet will take care of us forever or else we will fail at the most important task ever imaginable.
No Photokaren
October 17, 2009
03:58 AM
I think it was a succes even if the results didn't go as planned it was still a major contribution to history.
melvin polatnickmelvin polatnick
October 15, 2009
11:13 AM
NASA is one of many military programs run by DOD. They have no purpose except to discover exotic weapons systems. Finding water on the moon is just a coverup for their real motives.
No Photojaninecg
October 15, 2009
12:12 AM
Isn't the earth like 80% water? Why are they looking for more?! Leave the moon and the natural order of things alone.
No PhotoxVincenTx
October 13, 2009
10:02 PM
What is wrong with nasa? Smashing d moon just 2 find out something..people dont hve contentment..im afraid they end up destroying d moon, same as the Earth..why don't u guyz just stop exploring some stuffs that harming our planet.. REMEMBER THAT GOD CREATED HEAVEN AND EARTH. And we don't have d rigths 2 destroy it.
No Photomyles57
October 13, 2009
06:09 PM
I'm questioning if it was worth it. I guess you have to take a chance but. I don't know
No Photofriedsushi
October 13, 2009
05:50 PM
I thought this was a good idea and was well played, but at the same time what can be really gained from it? Do we have the technology and man power to actually get these materials from the moon? Will it just crash and burn? It's alot of questions that I don't see being answers.
No Photominusalladditions
October 13, 2009
04:23 PM
Before too many people argue that the financial cost of this, or other seemingly unnecessary space endeavors, is too great for these times, please remember that any and all of these explorations have the possibility of benefiting all humankind. Granted, these benefits will usually not present themselves for many years to come, but at least the overall mission and cooperation of many of Earth's great minds is focused on a nonviolent and potentially species-saving goal. Combining all the expenditures of the space-faring nations' programs would be a mere drop in the bucket compared to the obscene amount of money, resources, and lives we (humans) spend on our many wars. So, I say keep sending up rockets...keep crashing into moons and asteroids, keep our telescopes working and improving. Keep doing anything that every once in a while causes the world, especially the children, to look to the sky and dream. We need more astronauts...less soldiers.
No PhotoMensCornerOnline.com
October 13, 2009
08:00 AM
Found this report to be very interesting, this is a big find for us!
No PhotoJames T. Conklin, P.E.
October 12, 2009
06:31 PM
NASA'S MOON-ICE PROBE BOONDOGGLE

The anticipated "Violent Impact" and "huge cloud of lunar dust and ice crystals" was not observed on a 30-foot TV display by the gullible assembled masses.

Is NASA aware that there is no atmosphere on the Moon? A particle of Moon dust will fall back to the Moon's surface with the same acceleration as a bowling ball. Reference: High school physics.

NASA spokesmen have stated that the importance of finding ice on the Moon is that water could provide hydrogen for fuel and oxygen to breathe.

Is NASA aware that far more energy is required to disassociate H2O into H2 and O2 than can be recovered by the recombination of H2 and O2 to produce useful work such as rocket propulsion? Reference: Engineering chemistry and thermodynamics.

Is NASA aware that the practical absurdities of men mining polar Moon-ice crystals for any useful purpose on the Moon are too numerous to enumerate?
CHARLESCHARLES
October 12, 2009
04:00 PM
I thought it was funny that people were having viewing parties for this, and then there was no "big explosion". I think now NASA is saying that the rocket hit a "dry patch" where there was no water, maybe they will try again?
No PhotoKayla
October 12, 2009
03:51 PM
If we can not only travel to the moon but also successfully blow it up, I don't know why we can't figure out how to keep Americans from dying due to lack of health care. Priorities, I guess.
No PhotoLauren
October 12, 2009
03:37 PM
I'm not sure that potential successes are worth the money spent in research, and it does seem like we are doing more harm than good on the moon.
IrishAngleIrishAngle
October 12, 2009
02:16 PM
I watched live and was disappointed - perhaps only because network anchors created an expectation that the impact would be visible. I suspect this will be logged as a PR misstep by NASA.
No PhotoBilly
October 12, 2009
11:47 AM
Congratulations, NASA is successful at playing interstellar darts. I don't think we have to worry about "harming the moon," we have much more pressing issues here on Earth. NEXT.
akorozcoakorozco
October 12, 2009
11:42 AM
This would be the COOLEST THING if I was still 7 years old. Now, I think most people agree with me that we have better things to be spending money on.
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy