Gitmo Suspects to Stand Trial in U.S.

12345
RSS Feeds
October 12, 2009
3:18
Democratic lawmakers members pushed to allow terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay detention camp to be trialed in the U.S. Media outlets ask what it means for the U.S.
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No Photowild bill
October 18, 2009
09:58 PM
Don't close the, jail. Set up court bring the cameras and pres.Start military justice, then send them to America to serve there sentence.Why is this so hard?
No PhotoDeisel61
October 18, 2009
07:43 PM
Obama's whole agenda is " Fire, Ready, Aim" Not one of his campaign promises have gone through...Electing a President is not like cheering for your favorite sports team. All the people who never voted in their lives and displayed t-shirts, stickers....etc., should share a cell with a terroist! By the way, to the "certain" people that were crying on this "hisorical day"..... was your mortgage payment ever paid off??? Simpeltons!!
No Phototeh interwebz
October 15, 2009
04:26 PM
How are these people any different than the sociopaths or serial killers we routinely try and jail in our "neighborhoods". The only logical and slightly plausible argument against this I can see is how to handle the sensitive information that may be necessary to try the people in Gitmo. But even then we've prosecuted spies for years so there must be some mechanisms in place to handle just those situations.

We're in mountain out of a mole hill territory on this one.
No Photomr g
October 14, 2009
04:18 PM
The prison should be relocated, not shut down
Ashanya IndralingamAshanya Indralingam
October 14, 2009
03:55 PM
Gitmo was-- up until its closure-- out-of-sight, out-of-mind. Many Americans even applauded the move to shut down the prison, infamous for housing captives of America's War on Terror, after accusations of human rights abuses surfaced.

But now that they might have to deal with alleged 'terrorists' on their own soil, suddenly the 'War on Terror' becomes real.

Really, what did people think would happen to detainees? If the US is pressing charges against someone, I don't see why they shouldn't be tried in the country. At least on US soil, suspects are more likely to get access to a fair trial.
No Photomaybe
October 14, 2009
12:08 AM
Where was the perspective that some of them might be innocent? That's why we have trials, that's why we have habeas corpus, that's what makes us a fair and justice seeking country.
No Photomaybe
October 14, 2009
12:05 AM
Where was the perspective that some of them might be innocent? That's why we have trials, that's why we have habeas corpus. That's American.
Stephanie HermesStephanie Hermes
October 13, 2009
04:31 PM
A federal prison in northern Michigan is being discussed for where the detainee would be transferred. If we are holding them, they should be tried in the US, but I think that particular location is odd logistically if something were to happen.
IndigoIndigo
October 13, 2009
09:14 AM
Ditto to Kayla's comment. And where are we going to try them if not the US? They are captives of the US. If we weren't prepared to try them here, maybe it was premature to put them in our detention facilities.
No PhotoKayla
October 12, 2009
05:17 PM
I kind of agree with the Wash Post that the fear of having terrorists in your backyard is irrational. These people aren't superhuman. And their whole goal is to make you TERRIFIED of them, which it seems many of us are. I for one wouldn't mind seeing them finally face justice (or even be rightfully acquitted, if that's the case).
No PhotoLauren
October 12, 2009
04:49 PM
Much like the New Yorker interviewed by Russia Today, I didn't really have an opinion either until I thought about the possibility that these prisoners could end up in my neighborhood. Also, the lack of explanation on Obama's part does highlight the less thought out aspects of this plan.
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy