Democracy for Afghanistan?

12345
RSS Feeds
August 19, 2009
2:38
A recent spate of attacks on civilian targets in Kabul by the Taliban in Afghanistan have added a new obstacle to democracy in the midst of the country’s second presidential election.
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No PhotoStella
August 20, 2009
07:16 PM
Why can't we let them work it out on their own? Why do we need to interfere?
Sarah CanaveseSarah Canavese
August 20, 2009
04:53 PM
I don't think we should push. If it works, it does, if not, we shouldn't have ANYTHING to do with it. This is a country, and it has been around for a long time. If it is meant to continue on, whatever we do wont make that much difference.
melvin polatnickmelvin polatnick
August 20, 2009
01:05 PM
Elections in Afghanistan will not help tame ferocious tribal leaders. A democratic regime in that part of the world does not work. America should look to its best friend, king Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. He alone understands how to treat infidels and dissidents. His wisdom has kept him in power for over 50 years. Kingdoms and kings are needed not democracies. Saudi Arabia has proven that freedom is not an option for 14th century cultures.
No PhotoUhip
August 20, 2009
11:28 AM
Although the Taliban is disrupting the election, Afghanistan is at least moving towards to democracy little by little. There will always be conflicts in this country no matter what happens. The Taliban is always there. We're talking about changing the whole country, not a single person. This is not an easy job, but I still think that it's impossible over time.
No PhotoStephanie
August 20, 2009
11:20 AM
I agree with CNN. I think it's too early for the country to have a complete democracy. We should let things be the way it is. If Afghanistan is not ready, it is not ready. No one, even Americans, can't push them through democracy.
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy