Africa: Aiding or Abetting?

12345
RSS Feeds
August 30, 2009
3:43
Sending aid to Africa has seemed like trying to fill up a black hole, with few concrete results. But are we just throwing dirt in the wrong place?
YOU NEED FLASH TO VIEW THIS VIDEO
No Photoceckel
September 1, 2009
06:40 PM
I think the fact that people are selling the Unicef packs instead of making sure they get to the people they are meant to help is a huge issue. There is something going on there. All in all I think it is definitely necessary to take another look at the way aid is being given in Africa, because if improperly used, it does no good.
Stephanie HermesStephanie Hermes
September 1, 2009
06:26 PM
As more elite people, I believe, as human beings, we have a obligation to help the fellow people of the world. This is especially true of us, citizens of the US, who have so much in abundance. The current aid may not be providing the help planned because of the corruption in Africa (as seen in the clips). Our aid should not only be in resources but in the knowledge we have in job creation and infrastructure. As the suppliers of aid, we should ensure the success of our aid by going to Africa and helping at the scene.
IndigoIndigo
September 1, 2009
09:12 AM
Our attitude towards Africa has been condescending pretty much since the colonial era. We need to at least cut back on the handouts and really get serious about seeing them become productive global citizens, though whether that be manufacturing, agriculture, mining, or even outsourced administrative work (as was so popular in India), I can't say. But I think Samura's point is spot-on. If we continue to send free aid, most of it will be skimmed by the elites, leaving not nearly enough for everyone else.
smcf69smcf69
August 31, 2009
05:18 PM
Well it should be evaluated. Even if what we were doing was working more than it seems to be, it should often been evaluated because as the country does develop our strategies there need to change...
IrishAngleIrishAngle
August 31, 2009
04:16 PM
Most African countries are still bedeviled with the legacy of their colonial era and the corruption of the governments that followed. Corruption caused vast natural resources and economic opportunities to be squandered. Corruption undermines many aid programs in African countries. It would be interesting to benchmark why India, which was under the colonial rule of the British for 200 years, has emerged as a global power and Africa continues to struggle.
No PhotoLauen Foreman
August 31, 2009
03:38 PM
I think aid might be addressing the effects of a demolished infrastructure and improperly functioning political system, but it does not attack the problem at its core. I would have to agree that job creation and redefining a political structure that has been devastated by prebendalism would be a better use of resources and time.
robotsoulrobotsoul
August 31, 2009
01:06 PM
I think this has a lot to do with how we view Africa, as a backward, strife ridden nebulous mass. Huts, nudity, weird food, disease, poverty, blood diamonds and ethnic conflict, this is the Africa we see. Chances are city, infrastructure, economy, are not words most in the U.S. would associate with the continent. Yes, Africa needs aid, but we need to shift the focus on Africa to include more substantive forms of aid-micropayments are a good start. We should stop trying to be a paternal caretaker, and instead create policies that help the continent fend for itself by creating jobs. Also, the NYT quote maybe a little stereotypical no?
EDITOR'S PICK|MOST POPULAR|MOST RECENT|MOST COMMENTED|HIGHEST RATED

SMART VIDEO SNAPSHOTS

2:37
November 18, 2009
2:36
November 16, 2009
2:48
November 16, 2009

Newsy