SEARCH RESULTS

DISCUSSION

No Photo
November 21, 2009
09:48 AM
This is horrible. I love mickey mouse the way he is. Mickey is loved by many children around the world including me. Me and my parents were about to go to Disney World, But if they give Mickey a makeover... What will happen to the Parks? Or a better question, The Other Charecters.  View
No Photo
November 21, 2009
09:29 AM
My daughter is 2 and just started falling in love with mickey she wants to watch him 24 hours a day And I have been a fan of mickey mouse my whole life he is the heart of Disney and let me tell you if he is changed to a darker character he will not be suitable for my daughter and I will not let her watch it and we will not be supporting disney anymore mickey stands for one of the last little shred of good in this world magic, the happiness of childhood and it would be disrespectful in the highest sense to a great man like Walt Disney to change the character he loved this is what he is remembered for it all started with a mouse... DONT CHANGE HIM!!  View
No Photo
November 20, 2009
02:14 PM
this is no surprise, the developing world has problems of its own  View
No PhotoChiguy87
November 20, 2009
12:02 PM
People don't realize that world hunger could end TODAY if governments stopped paying their farmers NOT to produce.  View
No PhotoChiguy87
November 20, 2009
11:53 AM
I would have to agree with the BBC perspective. People have to realize that his accomplishments are very difficult to carry out, especially in the "second most corrupt nation in the world." Also, what is that music playing in the background of the MSNBC clip? I like it.  View
No Photo
November 20, 2009
10:04 AM
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! Do Not Change Mickey. There is enough darkness in the world. We turn to Mickey for the Happiness and Magic he brings.  View
No PhotoACrimaldi
November 19, 2009
03:10 PM
This idea of ending world hunger by 2015 is completely unrealistic. I'm not sure the goal will ever be attained. I agree most with NTDTV when Nwanze said we should not only provide on financial assistance from the developed world. Maybe each individual country should first tackle their own hunger problems?  View
No Photo
November 19, 2009
02:38 PM
Once a healthcare bill is passed and signed by the president, 40 thousand soldiers will be on their way. Senators from states that supply weapons to our troops got down with the program only after being assured of a troop buildup in Afghanistan. Its a give and take world.  View
No Photo
November 19, 2009
10:41 AM
I beleive this does show how the world might end. BUT. It's not going to end like in the movie. There's more to the end then an economic and social collapse. It'll be more of an independent survival rather than a collabrated effort by the world GOVERNMENTS.  View
No Photo
November 18, 2009
12:25 PM
Was there a mistake in etiquette, yes. Should we be reading so far into this that we now assume Obama wants to rule the world (Limbaugh)? Of course not. We should take this at face value as a simple motion of respect until we are given a good reason to think it meant something more significant. Jumping to wild conclusions over something so simple is a waste of frustration.  View

Newsy