SEARCH RESULTS

DISCUSSION

plewis6plewis6
March 17, 2010
11:40 AM
Terrorism in Pakistan is obviously a problem that needs to be addressed as well as the larger problem of a weak police force.  View
OstroffOstroff
March 16, 2010
01:22 PM
yeah Juarez is pretty hard core. I don't think it is 'terrorism' so much as organized crime. I don't think the U.S. will make substantive commitments to ending this violence until it spills over the border. Killing Americans in a dangerous town is one thing, doing it in a Texas suburb is another.  View
Anna GaynorAnna Gaynor
March 11, 2010
11:35 AM
I agree with Alter Net. We need to start recognizing what leads to this sort of terrorism. We, as a country, will never be completely safe. To do that we'd have to start taking tips from '1984.'  View
IndigoIndigo
March 12, 2010
02:43 PM
ABC hasn't been paying attention. There shouldn't be "new" concern about female terrorists because they aren't a new phenomenon. For that matter, there shouldn't be "new" concern about domestic terrorism, seeing as the first terrorist in recorded history (John Brown) was employed (literally paid) to incite terror in the US during the Civil War by murdering innocents in their own homes. Terror isn't regional - it's ideological.  View
Ross TaylorRoss Taylor
February 24, 2010
03:06 PM
I'm glad to hear Stack's daughter rescinded her statement of calling her father "a hero." No matter the ideology, domestic terrorism should not and will not be viewed as heroism in this country.  View
Lauren BLauren B
February 23, 2010
06:42 PM
I don't understand why everyone is still friends with Israel. If you look at the history of conflict of the region, Israel is almost as bad as Palestine regarding terrorism. Then again, it's not terrorism if you're the one doing it, right?  View
Ross TaylorRoss Taylor
February 21, 2010
02:08 PM
If the Oklahoma City bombing was considered domestic terrorism, then the Austin incident certainly falls under the same criteria.  View
No PhotoRosa Sow
February 16, 2010
04:31 PM
After having collectively lived through an event like 911 Americans will always be cautious about terrorism. Cheney is not being cautious he is being hawkish. He is doing interviews to further a communications strategy not a military one.  View
Mike RazimMike Razim
January 27, 2010
03:35 PM
I agree, what country really is truly prepared for an attack with weapons of mass destruction. It's obvious that countries, including the US, are not prepared because that is why others plan these attacks. If terrorists knew we could handle biological warfare and other terrorism, they would have no incentive for hoarding weapons of mass destruction in the first place or designing new ones.  View
BrinnedBrinned
January 27, 2010
03:47 PM
I have to agree with all of the previous posters. If we were prepared they'd find another way to attack us. Terrorism is about hitting countries where they are weak. It is also about inciting terror, thus the comment of one of the users. That is an interesting question. Are media creating a culture of fear? Should this have been reported differently?  View

SEARCH RESULTS

STORIES

There currently are no stories on this topic.

Newsy