SEARCH RESULTS

VIDEO

2:13
May 15, 2009
2:11
May 13, 2009

SEARCH RESULTS

DISCUSSION

No Photorobotsoul
November 18, 2009
12:30 PM
I think the unfriend/defriend dichotomy defined by the ABC seems pretty accurate. It is interesting that this isn't a hyphenate because it should be. This also changes the definition of 'friend' which is interesting. Technology is giving us more branded words, like 'tweet' and 'unfriend' or 'googled'.  View
No Photo
November 18, 2009
12:40 AM
Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case http://lpcyu.instablogs.com/entry/nato-says-the-hague-tribunal-or-icty-belongs-to-nato- truth-bites-for-te-hague-lately/ http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/ViewMyHagueInternationalCriminalCourtPreparat oryDocumentsFromThe2001UnitedNations# (The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images) This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not. Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others. I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding. Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country%u2019s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, %u201CSpain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague%u2019s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.%u201D ((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a %u201Dtotally legitimate topic%u201D discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked! The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss." Some countries agreed with Spain%u2019s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent international criminal court.)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, "Spain" must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was "socially acceptable" for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student. SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally! SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT."  View
No Photo
November 17, 2009
12:48 AM
No they certainly should not be able to use these scams! at the same time people need to be aware of and wary of all 'deals' on the internet!! if you share personal information without reading the fine print then you are not being cautious enough. Wht the founder said was about getting users to download a toolbar..that seemingly wouldn't go away...yahoo and google have stuff like this everywhere but they get away with it too! its not harmful but very annoying...  View
No Photo
October 4, 2009
05:56 PM
For those questioning Michael Moore's numbers...great idea to google. We're out here, we who WANT the change and the public option for sure! Some of us have enough education and dignity not to be seeking the publicity that the FAUX news lemmings seek. Michael Moore challenged doubters to disprove his facts in previous documentaries ... none were successful.  View
No Photo
October 1, 2009
07:14 PM
Ashley/Stephanie, Have you made an attempt to find out where he gets the numbers? I suspect not, as it isn't very difficult to locate the source. Google (and a small amount of your time) will answer a lot of questions, eliminating the need for comments like yours. Thanks, James  View
No PhotoDerrick Ho
September 18, 2009
12:01 PM
I'm not sure if this will perpetuate a visual bias in the media, though there may be some truth in that. I'd like to think that it may actually help bridge the gap by using pictures to get more people to read more. Think how Google is helping to facilitate that by simplifying layout might just do the trick.  View
No Photojhnnybgood
September 10, 2009
03:01 PM
Take the OS to the internet. Esentially turn everyone's computer into a dumb terminal. No more viruses, hardware will perform a thousand times better and Google will remain in it's strongest domain. That's the innovation I believe Google could do to upset Microsoft.  View
No Photo
September 2, 2009
06:55 PM
How do you explain the speeches I heard and saw on a clip How Van Jones, Obamas' Green Job Czar, approves of communism. and was one of the founders of "Storm". I did see and hear this along with millions of Americans. Go on Google and see for yourself. GOD BLESS AMERICA AND MAY WE CONTINUE TO BE FREE.  View
No Photo
September 1, 2009
08:30 PM
Google anyone of his comments. you may find that there is another side to the story and some were in between is the truth. Glen lust does this for ratings and $$$.  View
No Photo
August 13, 2009
07:57 PM
The American people are at the end of their fuses, because for decades they have been supporting hundreds of thousands of businesses who hire illegal immigrants? Hundreds of billions of dollars are going into the pockets of corporate executives, because they pay--nothing--other than minimum wages to foreign nationals. Businesses are very well aware that taxpayers will keep supporting the 20 million plus already here, because a government mandated laws says its demanded of us? European Industrialized nations are also in the same place, having to deal with a EU parliament who are also forcing the same mandatory laws. In America there is a safety net for people who have lost their jobs and forced into the breadline? But illegal alien families who broke our sovereignty laws, have intentionally taken advantage of public welfare and federal legislation that gives them a right to our schools, health care and a whole barrel of benefits instead of US residents. Now President Obama wants to give AMNESTY, rewarding these people for crossing our almost defenseless border. This must not happen to the American workers and the rest of our population, because the Heritage Foundation has stated that just in retirement and pensions it exceeds $2 Trillion dollars. Even legal immigrants numbers have accelerated to 1. 5 million annually. We need no more poor, uneducated to sustain in America. We must cut down quotas to only the skilled contributors, who will not become a public charges. Then does anybody have an answer for those who will come after this AMNESTY? Eventually the millions who will come here, will lead to irreversible OVERPOPULATION. WE ALREADY HAVE IMMIGRATION LAWS, BUT HAVE SADLY BEEN UNENFORCED AND ARE NOT BROKEN? THE SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS, WANT ABSOLUTELY--NO RESTRICTIONS-- ON HOW MANY FOREIGN CHEAP LABOR CAN BE ALLOWED INTO THE US? OBSERVERS HAVE SEEN THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF MASS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION INTO THE SANCTUARY STATE OF CALIFORNIA? Get involved with the power of E-Verify, a composite of the SAVE ACT, to remove illegal immigrants from businesses. Promote in addition 287(g) police law to question persons about their immigration status and stop the weakening of ICE raids and NO MATCH LAW. DON'T LET YOUR POLITICIAN GET AWAY WITH THESE IMMIGRATION TRAVESTIES? Like millions of livid Americans call 202-224-3121 GOOGLE NUMBERSUSA for the Facts, not lies.  View

Newsy